<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHPMyAdmin announces drop of PHP 4 support.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecodecave.com/article460/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article460</link>
	<description>Cold storage before my best ideas melt away...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article460#comment-52487</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article460#comment-52487</guid>
		<description>The impetus for WordPress is on hosts switching away from PHP4 support and the reality is that there will always be PHP4 builds, even if older, of phpMyAdmin. So phpMyAdmin switching future dev to PHP5 does not mean that hosts have to switch their PHP builds and upgrade phpMyAdmin.

If phpMyAdmin's switch does have the effect of making hosts switch their PHP support, then WordPress might also go that direction.

At least thats the impression I get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The impetus for WordPress is on hosts switching away from PHP4 support and the reality is that there will always be PHP4 builds, even if older, of phpMyAdmin. So phpMyAdmin switching future dev to PHP5 does not mean that hosts have to switch their PHP builds and upgrade phpMyAdmin.</p>
<p>If phpMyAdmin&#8217;s switch does have the effect of making hosts switch their PHP support, then WordPress might also go that direction.</p>
<p>At least thats the impression I get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.109 seconds -->
