<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to run PHP5 on 1and1.com in 1 easy step&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecodecave.com/article206/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206</link>
	<description>Cold storage before my best ideas melt away...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kalvan.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Irony</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-64255</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalvan.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Irony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-64255</guid>
		<description>[...] support. Scrolling through the comments, however, resulted in this gem, which eventually led me to this site. After making the simple change, the test script [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] support. Scrolling through the comments, however, resulted in this gem, which eventually led me to this site. After making the simple change, the test script [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-63667</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-63667</guid>
		<description>Hello, Dreamhost is expensive , high cost and very, very, very slow.
Too much services (ssh, great shell but very slowly).
It´s very no proffesional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Dreamhost is expensive , high cost and very, very, very slow.<br />
Too much services (ssh, great shell but very slowly).<br />
It´s very no proffesional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-62430</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-62430</guid>
		<description>I recently had a problem where on the 1and1 shared hosting setup my web site was hacked and started happily serving malware, I pulled the site asap and fortunately it was not the main one although it was the blog, being mighty peeved I wrote stinking email to the support diversion (deliberate pun) and they came back that I should have the addtype, my attitude is it is a shared server you morons you look after it.

Fact is if any site gets hacked because it is a weakness in the php (the 1and1 support techy's words not mine) it will infect the rest of the physical machine depending on how securely that is setup, or not in this case. I had to manually go through every sungle table and sql query to find the little bugger.

Anyway I have the same problem and I found out that 1and1 was to blame for another clients problems when they used the cgi only version instead of doing a proper install of php.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently had a problem where on the 1and1 shared hosting setup my web site was hacked and started happily serving malware, I pulled the site asap and fortunately it was not the main one although it was the blog, being mighty peeved I wrote stinking email to the support diversion (deliberate pun) and they came back that I should have the addtype, my attitude is it is a shared server you morons you look after it.</p>
<p>Fact is if any site gets hacked because it is a weakness in the php (the 1and1 support techy&#8217;s words not mine) it will infect the rest of the physical machine depending on how securely that is setup, or not in this case. I had to manually go through every sungle table and sql query to find the little bugger.</p>
<p>Anyway I have the same problem and I found out that 1and1 was to blame for another clients problems when they used the cgi only version instead of doing a proper install of php.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61859</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61859</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I just created a file in my root directory called "testphp.php" and opened that in my browser after editing my .htaccess ... Worked great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I just created a file in my root directory called &#8220;testphp.php&#8221; and opened that in my browser after editing my .htaccess &#8230; Worked great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61826</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61826</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much - this really helped us out - all fixed now at www.empdesigns.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much - this really helped us out - all fixed now at <a href="http://www.empdesigns.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.empdesigns.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendrik</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61641</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61641</guid>
		<description>THX very much for the tipp.

Since 1and1 changed something on their hosting enviroment my gallery2 and wordpres just gave up working. Just with these two tiny lines everything is fine now.

2 thumbs up :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THX very much for the tipp.</p>
<p>Since 1and1 changed something on their hosting enviroment my gallery2 and wordpres just gave up working. Just with these two tiny lines everything is fine now.</p>
<p>2 thumbs up <img src='http://www.thecodecave.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61347</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61347</guid>
		<description>There are two that I have experience with and would personally recommend. They are in no particular order, ServerBeach.com and DreamHost.com.

Server Beach is VERY WordPress friendly and I've met them and wear their shirts.  We host some machines with them for b5media.  In fact I should make certain I put one of their stickers on my laptop.

DreamHost.com is well named. You will not be unhappy with them.  They have a great group of people and their tech team is top knotch.  They had a recent billing snafu, that went spiraling south quickly as they quickly swung the other way sending out refunds where none were due.  Through this whole thing, they handled the issues quite openly and professionally.  The fact of the matter is that stuff happens.  What you do about it shows your character and how Dreamhost handled this proved everything I'd always suspected about them when I looked at them from a distance.  And I would proudly wear one of their shirts too if I had one. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two that I have experience with and would personally recommend. They are in no particular order, ServerBeach.com and DreamHost.com.</p>
<p>Server Beach is VERY WordPress friendly and I&#8217;ve met them and wear their shirts.  We host some machines with them for b5media.  In fact I should make certain I put one of their stickers on my laptop.</p>
<p>DreamHost.com is well named. You will not be unhappy with them.  They have a great group of people and their tech team is top knotch.  They had a recent billing snafu, that went spiraling south quickly as they quickly swung the other way sending out refunds where none were due.  Through this whole thing, they handled the issues quite openly and professionally.  The fact of the matter is that stuff happens.  What you do about it shows your character and how Dreamhost handled this proved everything I&#8217;d always suspected about them when I looked at them from a distance.  And I would proudly wear one of their shirts too if I had one. <img src='http://www.thecodecave.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61300</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61300</guid>
		<description>@Michael

A Small Orange offers both PHP4 and PHP5. SSL works with no gimmicks.

http://www.asmallorange.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael</p>
<p>A Small Orange offers both PHP4 and PHP5. SSL works with no gimmicks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.asmallorange.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.asmallorange.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: travis</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61290</link>
		<dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61290</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip, I had AddType x-mapp-php5 .php already in my .htaccess and experienced the issue with it defaulting to php4 when using SSL.  I added the line AddHandler x-mapp-php5 .php and it worked great!! thanks for saving me from renaming all my php files!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip, I had AddType x-mapp-php5 .php already in my .htaccess and experienced the issue with it defaulting to php4 when using SSL.  I added the line AddHandler x-mapp-php5 .php and it worked great!! thanks for saving me from renaming all my php files!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61248</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61248</guid>
		<description>For those of you who are anti 1and1, what host would you suggest as an alternative (and don't say godaddy) ? I have been relatively pleased with 1and1 until I tried using the Zend Framework with it and it has just been a confusing mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who are anti 1and1, what host would you suggest as an alternative (and don&#8217;t say godaddy) ? I have been relatively pleased with 1and1 until I tried using the Zend Framework with it and it has just been a confusing mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61093</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-61093</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much man! As soon as I needed PHP 5 and found it was not the default, I got a little worried, but one quick search and alas I found your tip! You've saved the day for me! Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much man! As soon as I needed PHP 5 and found it was not the default, I got a little worried, but one quick search and alas I found your tip! You&#8217;ve saved the day for me! Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jts</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-59686</link>
		<dc:creator>jts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-59686</guid>
		<description>Probably one of their automated tools?  Did you password protect any directories or use any other 1and1 web tools to manage your account?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably one of their automated tools?  Did you password protect any directories or use any other 1and1 web tools to manage your account?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lon</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-59685</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-59685</guid>
		<description>works fantastic, but any chance you know why something keeps rewriting my htaaccess file and removing those lines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>works fantastic, but any chance you know why something keeps rewriting my htaaccess file and removing those lines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-55744</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-55744</guid>
		<description>There is a link somwhere in 1and1's help desk but it is buried really deep in there.  I thought about taking down this post when I saw it was there but then I figured that if I couldn't find it till I knew what to look for, others were probably in the same boat.   Glad this worked for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a link somwhere in 1and1&#8217;s help desk but it is buried really deep in there.  I thought about taking down this post when I saw it was there but then I figured that if I couldn&#8217;t find it till I knew what to look for, others were probably in the same boat.   Glad this worked for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jts</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-55705</link>
		<dc:creator>jts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-55705</guid>
		<description>Rail....

Tried it and used a specific PHP5 test (hello world with a try/catch) and it seemed to work.  Not sure why the help desk didn't offer that up!  Will have to do more testing to double check it is working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rail&#8230;.</p>
<p>Tried it and used a specific PHP5 test (hello world with a try/catch) and it seemed to work.  Not sure why the help desk didn&#8217;t offer that up!  Will have to do more testing to double check it is working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rail</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-55704</link>
		<dc:creator>Rail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-55704</guid>
		<description>In .htaccess put:

AddType x-mapp-php5 .php

AddHandler x-mapp-php5 .php

seems to work on our secure site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In .htaccess put:</p>
<p>AddType x-mapp-php5 .php</p>
<p>AddHandler x-mapp-php5 .php</p>
<p>seems to work on our secure site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluefish</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-38196</link>
		<dc:creator>bluefish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-38196</guid>
		<description>Hiya - I had the same issue on 1and1 - using the SSL certificate that comes integrated with their accounts - https seemed to just the AddType from working.

I used phpinfo to check - and the https server did default back to PHP4.

So I added AddHandler x-mapp-php5 .php to my .htaccess  ... and way hay everything is back to php5 :-)

Another way round this is to use their free ssl relay service which seems to keep everything working happily on PHP5 - but you do end up with an ugly url ...
In 1and1 control panel - in admin / domains select which domain you want to register with their relay server then just use
https://sslrelay.com/ 

Hope that helps someone ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya - I had the same issue on 1and1 - using the SSL certificate that comes integrated with their accounts - https seemed to just the AddType from working.</p>
<p>I used phpinfo to check - and the https server did default back to PHP4.</p>
<p>So I added AddHandler x-mapp-php5 .php to my .htaccess  &#8230; and way hay everything is back to php5 <img src='http://www.thecodecave.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Another way round this is to use their free ssl relay service which seems to keep everything working happily on PHP5 - but you do end up with an ugly url &#8230;<br />
In 1and1 control panel - in admin / domains select which domain you want to register with their relay server then just use<br />
<a href="https://sslrelay.com/" rel="nofollow">https://sslrelay.com/</a> </p>
<p>Hope that helps someone &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTS</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-32249</link>
		<dc:creator>JTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-32249</guid>
		<description>hehe.  That's the million dollar questions (or 14.95 a month).  Thank God I built the system in a relatively modular fashion, as I only had to change the names of the business processing scripts.    (http://EverythingFreight.com if you are interested).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe.  That&#8217;s the million dollar questions (or 14.95 a month).  Thank God I built the system in a relatively modular fashion, as I only had to change the names of the business processing scripts.    (http://EverythingFreight.com if you are interested).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-31373</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-31373</guid>
		<description>Oh, I understood that, I just don't understand why secure mode has any thing do do with it unless it is somehow first being processed through a seperate server...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I understood that, I just don&#8217;t understand why secure mode has any thing do do with it unless it is somehow first being processed through a seperate server&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jts</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-31341</link>
		<dc:creator>jts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-31341</guid>
		<description>Brian, the cert came with the developer package.  I used the default setup procedures that 1and1.com provides. 
My entire web-app was built in PHP5.  It works great with the .HTACCESS file in non-secure mode.  As soon as you switch over to the good ol' HTTPS, it bombs miserably.  I've tried renaming some of the files to be .PHP5 and it does actually work.  Its just frustrating that the .HTACCESS file does not work in HTTPS mode.   1and1 usually hasn't given me any grief, but if they are going to support PHP5 AND provide documentation demonstrating the .HTACCESS file, they should definetly make it clear that it will not work in Secure mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, the cert came with the developer package.  I used the default setup procedures that 1and1.com provides.<br />
My entire web-app was built in PHP5.  It works great with the .HTACCESS file in non-secure mode.  As soon as you switch over to the good ol&#8217; HTTPS, it bombs miserably.  I&#8217;ve tried renaming some of the files to be .PHP5 and it does actually work.  Its just frustrating that the .HTACCESS file does not work in HTTPS mode.   1and1 usually hasn&#8217;t given me any grief, but if they are going to support PHP5 AND provide documentation demonstrating the .HTACCESS file, they should definetly make it clear that it will not work in Secure mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-31092</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-31092</guid>
		<description>Oh, how interesting...  I'm not buying the "simply doesn't work" answer.   There's more to it then that, I'm sure.   How do you have your https configured.   Are you using your own certificate or the shared one?  This is something I've not yet played with on these servers.  I bet there is a deeper answer to your problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, how interesting&#8230;  I&#8217;m not buying the &#8220;simply doesn&#8217;t work&#8221; answer.   There&#8217;s more to it then that, I&#8217;m sure.   How do you have your https configured.   Are you using your own certificate or the shared one?  This is something I&#8217;ve not yet played with on these servers.  I bet there is a deeper answer to your problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTS</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-30876</link>
		<dc:creator>JTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-30876</guid>
		<description>The "AddType" rule works great for non-secured sites on 1and1.com, but NOT secured sites.  From one of the "support" people at 1and1 (I use the word "support" lightly).

"The AddType rule will not work when accessing through https. You will
need to rename any scripts that should be parsed in PHP 5 to end in
.php5."

I ended up renaming everything to get it to work.  Ridiculous actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;AddType&#8221; rule works great for non-secured sites on 1and1.com, but NOT secured sites.  From one of the &#8220;support&#8221; people at 1and1 (I use the word &#8220;support&#8221; lightly).</p>
<p>&#8220;The AddType rule will not work when accessing through https. You will<br />
need to rename any scripts that should be parsed in PHP 5 to end in<br />
.php5.&#8221;</p>
<p>I ended up renaming everything to get it to work.  Ridiculous actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliptical . . . : Blog Archive : links for 2007-05-20</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-24996</link>
		<dc:creator>elliptical . . . : Blog Archive : links for 2007-05-20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 07:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-24996</guid>
		<description>[...] How to run PHP5 on * in 1 easy step… Originally about 1and1, who host some of my sites. (tags: php web hosting howto reference BryanLayman)   Tags:None [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to run PHP5 on * in 1 easy step… Originally about 1and1, who host some of my sites. (tags: php web hosting howto reference BryanLayman)   Tags:None [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-24310</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-24310</guid>
		<description>Both!  

The default PHP processor IS 4.4.1. and that's what you get when you run php directly from the command line.

However, when a request comes through the http: interface, Apache will see the over-ride and send it to the newer release.

So, both are telling the truth, because you are asking two different questions.

Hope that helps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both!  </p>
<p>The default PHP processor IS 4.4.1. and that&#8217;s what you get when you run php directly from the command line.</p>
<p>However, when a request comes through the http: interface, Apache will see the over-ride and send it to the newer release.</p>
<p>So, both are telling the truth, because you are asking two different questions.</p>
<p>Hope that helps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pear</title>
		<link>http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-24307</link>
		<dc:creator>pear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecodecave.com/article206#comment-24307</guid>
		<description>but if you type 
php -v
In the command line, you will get php 4.4.1

which one tell you the truth? phpinfo() or command line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but if you type<br />
php -v<br />
In the command line, you will get php 4.4.1</p>
<p>which one tell you the truth? phpinfo() or command line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.303 seconds -->
